Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul Murray's avatar

All of what Mr. Bonner has written can be accurate and true, but I can tell you one thing with certainty: Chevron USA would NOT be down there, if it were not profitable to be there. Knowing Chevron as I do, there must not only be profit, but there must be an on-going upside. Chevron does not fool around when it comes to money. How do I know? My father-in-law was an Exec. VP with the company. He travelled half the world for them. He negotiated personally with the resource-magnate KC Irving in Canada. He was the company's liaison in Japan. He was regional development head for Central America. He started as a refinery manager and later as cat-cracker developer, engineer, and construction manager. He had numerous patents post graduation from Georgia Tech as a chemical engineer. (His brother, likewise an alumnus of Georgia Tech was a nuclear engineer and spent his career in Oak Ridge, TN.) My father-in-law, whom I had the privilege to call "Dad", knew the oil business from up and down and inside and out. Chevron knew it was not going to out-muscle Exxon, so they made it their business to out-hustle and and out-smart them. If Chevron is involved with Venezuela, I can promise you they are there, because they believe they will make money for the company AND its stockholders, which is their primary and proper raison d'etre. Best always. PM

Homer Bell's avatar

And we can expect Bill to report this as negatively as possible, since he has TDS.

78 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?