83 Comments
User's avatar
Jimm Roberts's avatar

As a former lobbyist for a US defense contractor, Bill's assessment of our Congress is spot on.

The lack of term limits and the lack of a Constitutional command to balance the budget combined with the right all US citizens to seek redress or succor from our Congress has created a perverse relationship between our Congress and the taxes we remit to our Federal government.

Members of Congress are not elected because they promise to be good stewards of the public purse.

And once they are elected, they are kept in office by providing their constituents access to the public purse.

AIPAC, like any other US entity, has the right to petition the Congress. Understandably, it puts the interests of Israel ahead of America's interests.

Based on its successes securing US taxpayer monies for Israel, including US tax deductions for buying Israeli bonds, it is a powerful lobby.

Years ago, I recall sharing an elevator with an AIPAC lobbyist chatting with a colleague. What I vividly recall was his cheery boast to his companion that whatever he wants from Congress he gets.

Mackinac's avatar

It makes sense, and I often wonder why Congress can't accomplish anything society needs.

Kevin Johnson's avatar

"The Senate has lost a believer in that body’s essential role in preserving democracy. Our nation has lost a great patriot and warrior".

Well now that was a load of dog vomit. Graham is why the USA is cynically referred to as West Israel.

An Ol' LSO's avatar

Well put. Genocides, Genocides, and more Genocides. How can anyone with a lick of sense condone genocides. Killing women, children, and babies. From my view point - how sick are these people. And, now we are seeing the World come against the Israel/U.S. venture. Russia, Iran, China, and even poor ol' Yemen are standing-up. The Days of American Hegemony is fading fast. And, of course, us peons will feel the pain - not the scammers and criminals in Washington. And Founding Fathers are turning in their graves!

Kevin Johnson's avatar

Lifetime exposure to NLP and high octane propaganda have turned people literally into zombies lacking any reasoning capability or common sense.

Tim Pallies's avatar

"Our nation has lost a great patriot and warrior." Surely I'm not the only one that feels a bit nauseous reading that quote in reference to Lindsay Graham.

Warrior? Perhaps in the sense that a warrior is one who is pleased to send your money and children to any far-off land, regardless of whether or not there is a defined and/or achievable goal.

An Ol' LSO's avatar

And, like most in Washington, they only send others off to far lands. And, today it is getting worse - easy to send others to die for nothing Americans care about. Such a horrific turn for America. They care nothing about democracy or freedom - and, in fact, they are against both. Pathetic!

Gordon's avatar

Tell it like it is Bill! Appreciate you always!

Ed Burns's avatar

I've heard this sophistry about opposition to Israel but not to Jews in general, before. From the kids in the streets of NYC who cheered on the Hamas butchers. The ones throwing Jewish babies in ovens on October 7th, of course then, the simple defense for the antisemites went to simply denying that any atrocities had been committed by Hamas. As if the cheerleaders for Hamas had any special insight or even gave a shit. .as if they weren't simply more of the bigoted antisemites we have seen in the past. Same sentiments - different ovens...

However, we did finally get some numbers out of Bill. $170b plus to Israel as proof of his version of Graham's "Deep State" (now being run by "the Jews", doncha know). How absurd. Particularly coming from the guy who still thinks the senile, office access selling Biden and his family weren't fleecing the nation even as they were corrupting our FBI and CIA - the real Deep State.

RossW's avatar

How conveniently you ignore that Israelis killed half as many Palestinians in EACH of the preceding dozen years before the October 'masacre', and they did it in lands they had no business being in, and were effectively paid by the Israeli government to at least occupy those lands with the obvious goal of driving the locals out or klilling them. I don't believe a single one of those murderers was ever prosecuted. Maybe you can show me a list of those that were?

Ed Burns's avatar

I’ll root for the people who give to the entire world literature, art and medical technology that seeks to wipe out disease. You can root for the people who slit the throats of innocent people on video and wipe their ass with their hand.

Cartero Atómico's avatar

But you ignore the violence of the IDF against women and children. There are an abundance of reports and videos of the IDF harassing and shooting at children. Plus Zionists stealing land and houses from Palestinians. Granted you support Israel 100% but how about the fact that we are providing aid to a country that has a debt/GDP ratio half of ours and a national healthcare system while many American citizens struggle with medical bills.

Ed Burns's avatar

When those Hamas rats scurried into their holes, taking Israeli men, women and children down with them, and leaving their own up above to suffer the wrath of the IDF, I don’t recall you raising your voice to defend the Jewish innocents.

Cartero Atómico's avatar

I'm not defending anyone. I'm saying you have to look at both sides of the story. But you didn't answer my question - Why should any American support sending our tax dollars to a country with a debt/GDP ratio half of ours and that has national health care, especially since many Americans struggle with insurance premiums and medical bills.

But read up on the Hannibal Directive. The IDF also killed Israelis that day and even Charlie Kirk was questioning the narrative. Mossad knows where an Iranian nuclear scientist is but didn't know Hamas was planning an attack on its border?

Mackinac's avatar

The whole situation is hate upon hate with a very long record. I can't believe the IDF didn't know about the attack on the Jewish women and children. There is no side which has decent morals in the hate respect.

Ed Burns's avatar

So, we finally see the core of your argument. You believe that the IDF, Netanyahu or whomever, sacrificed their own innocents in order to what? Kill Palestinian women and children? You really do need professional help. More so when you propose looking at the relative tax ledgers, debt and the like in order to get guidance on what is the right thing to do. I think you arrived first at your blood libel antisemitism and only then cast about for a cover story.

Xavier Narutowicz's avatar

What is religion. All men throughout history have believed in God. Civilization made it a racquet, the Pharaoh was God and Kings were ordained by God. The Catholic Church, all those ruinous popes, had the keys to heaven and hell, were infallible.

The Jews wrote it down; one man Abraham communed with God then various prophets. The people, as all people are want to do, waxed for God or against him, mostly led by leaders. After all the miracles in the dessert, during the Exodus, they built a golden calf. Religion is one golden calf after another raised up for the idiots by deceitful men and now women. Everyone is on God’s side, self righteous, for democracy and freedom. We must righteously kill, the more the better.

Christ said, “The essence of religion is to love God and your neighbor as yourself.”

The Jews today have a golden calf, Zionism. It makes them crazy. They have no religion; they hate God, trample their traditions, and kill their neighbors.

They are barbarous killers.

Linsey Graham is dead. “What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and suffer the loss of his soul.”

Ed Burns's avatar

What is religion? What is ethnicity? Skin color? Height? Weight? And on and on… Great question. Yet the primeval drive to categorize and sort out “danger” knows no bounds. Even when no danger actually presents itself there always a role for the scapegoat., Even if only to serve envy.

Xavier Narutowicz's avatar

“Yet the primeval drive to categorize and sort out “danger” knows no bounds. Even when no danger actually presents itself.”

Now, there is the essence of madness. Fear, even when no fear exists.

And, how do you achieve the peace beyond understanding? You can pursue the course of the Stoics and base it on God. If there is a God it should bear fruit.

“The only thing we have to fear…is fear itself.”

Man alone is always just a bundle of fear.

Man alone, is always just a cognizant fearful animal, but man that unifies his soul with God is eternal and righteous.

Ed Burns's avatar

Right… fear when there exists no real cause. Not complicated.

Tim Pallies's avatar

Some of us really don't want to "root for" anyone, and certainly don't want to pay for wars of choice half-way around the world. And for the record, I wish the people of Israel well.

Ed Burns's avatar

You can object to paying for war. It’s an age old question; one of flight versus fight. Just understand that some of us aren’t as sanguine as you when being threatened by 7th century primitives armed with 21st century nuclear weapons and the cruise missiles to deliver them. They’re religious nuts and nihilists and a death culture. But don’t concern yourself. We have fighters to address the issue.

Kevin Johnson's avatar

Israel created Hamas as controlled opposition, and they jointly executed the Oct 7 operation.

Cartero Atómico's avatar

Netanyahu actually did facilitate the funding of Hamas in order to keep the Palestinians divided. Here's a headline from the Israeli news: "For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it’s blown up in our faces".

User's avatar
Comment removed
Jul 15Edited
Comment removed
James ( Jim) Marshall's avatar

I like that. Just keep our mouths shut and salute! Yep I remember 65 years ago hearing that same sentiment floating off the coast of a land far, far, away.

crooked finger's avatar

I think ole bill would prefer that hamas or hezbola or the gangs of Mexico be in charge of the senate instead of Israel having more influence like all lefties he is not in favor of a nation that has more freedom he prefers the terrorists to be in charge

Cartero Atómico's avatar

Maybe he would prefer that the people of the US were in control of the CONgress? Why should any of these lobby groups be allowed to buy our representatives? Guys like Washington and Jefferson are probably rolling over in their graves watching what has become of this country. No foreign entanglements? Hell no, let's merge our military with the IDF.

Mackinac's avatar

After this discussion I see the problem. The corruption of the political system is so bad and warped there is no possible correction. Lobbying is supposedly a freedom of speech issue where truth should come forth after discussion. But obviously truth is a long way off because discussion is yielding opposites from a group which supposedly has good intentions. My suspicion is that everyone in this discussion likely has good intentions, including Bill, but it also obvious that honesty and integrity have been stretched so far they infer the opposite by two well meaning perspectives. Maybe that's why the founding fathers said these constructs were under God. Honesty and integrity were essential for the Constitution to have a snowball's chance in hell of working.

crooked finger's avatar

Supposedly we vote for them but like Stalin said he doesn't care how you vote he cares about who counts the vote I think this is our corrupt voting system here in the USA

Mackinac's avatar

One obvious correction is needed.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Jul 15
Comment removed
crooked finger's avatar

the dems are now all commies

rKf's avatar

It amazes me, - although it shouldn’t really - it amazes me how thinking people can be so wedded to a specific mindset they cannot step back a moment and consider alternative arguments. Would that our loyalties be broader, more deeply considered; would that seeking the truth be a higher priority than dithering over such and such political actions without expanding the context of decisions that affect real problems like overspending, overtaxing, overkilling. People hide beneath false flags, beneath the poorly defined concept of democracy, then engage in emotionally charged rants based on half-truths and/or falsehoods “full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” From another Bill, Shakespeare.

altschule's avatar

Bill why so many of us left the US long ago is that the stupid majority have NO idea that the US are actually the primary state of Israel .. they are absolutely in control !

Dan's avatar

Well, Bill, your essay today really stirred up the dust with your subscribers. Graham apparently falls within the group of “love him or hate him, nothing in between”. Bravo. Your subscribers are at each other’s throats again and this should fire up the subscribers to the point that they will spend their day trying to respond to disagreeing subscribers rather than worrying about if they are earning or losing money today. My point: You don’t provide financial advice to your subscribers [note I am using “subscribers” rather than another name because they PAID money to hear financial advice from you]. Instead, you lob these personal views into the crowd like shouting “fire” in a crowded theater just to enjoy the reactions of the masses. Seen you do this repeatedly and complained about it repeatedly.

So, one more time, Bill, let me advise: You are a self-made millionaire, maybe billionaire, and you sell your financial acumen to subscribers who hope to learn how they can do what you did. Leave the politics and its resulting vitriol out of your “advice” unless there is a direct link to making/saving/keep from losing money. We deserve better and you are capable of doing better. End of rant.

Mackinac's avatar

Can't agree more Dan. I'm guessing Bill's point is: Trump is making lots of mistakes or maybe with greater sympathy that Trump is just one more idiotic "leader" on the road to government destruction of the empire. But given Bill's propensity to go on and on against Trump it appears there is a genuine hate, like maybe a globalist/socialist would have. He does prefer to live in socialist countries. I can't see that as constructive. Seems a better approach would be to simply describe what better financial moves one should make. Maybe Bill doesn't know or is searching for that answer. However the leader of a "maximum safety" advocate we would all hope does have some direction. But Tom does seem to be given a genuine direction as does Dan. So what gives, Bill?

Fraser M's avatar

If you're paying attention, he IS showing you how to make money as a newsletter writer....

Kevin Wood's avatar

Hey, here’s a crazy idea. Have U.S. Senators chosen by their state legislatures instead of being voted in with a general election. Then we could easily get rid of the wayward ones who stray from what’s best for Americans. But then we’d have to return to the real America. Of course, our elected officials don’t really want to go there.

Homer Bell's avatar

nt.” Bombers and bombs cost money. Bombing Iran, for example, has no plausible benefits to the people of South Carolina. But Graham didn’t represent the people who voted for him. He was a loyal servant, not of ‘The People,’ but of the Deep State that owned him.”

You don’t know that for sure blowhard, if a nuclear missile had hit the east coast next year, he might have saved a lot of SC people.

Your TDS has blocked your mind from seeing what Jihad is capable of. He might have even saved your live unless you were off gallivanting around the world to all your amenity properties you own due to a capital system that Graham was excellent excellent example of. Homer Bell

Cartero Atómico's avatar

Who is going to hit the East Coast with a nuke? Even if Iran acquired a nuke why would they attack the US when they know they would be immediately wiped out?

But what if it's Israel that attacks the US? Here's what Israeli military historian and professor said: "We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force… We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under."

Maybe you should worry about Israel's nukes too!

Kevin Leader's avatar

They do not care if they are wiped out many virjins waiting for will be waiting for them:-)

Tom Langdon's avatar

You know he was voted to the house and then the senate many times and by large numbers. So maybe, just maybe, the people of SC believed he was doing a good job for them.

Bill Van Orden's avatar

Roosevelt also reasoned it was inconvenient to publicly recognize the holocaust until required. It must be nice for you to be able to apparently compartmentalize your conscience at will?

Tim Pallies's avatar

"Bombing Iran, for example, has no plausible benefits to the people of South Carolina."

"Bill, we have to fight them over there so they can't fight us over here," said the half-bright neocon warmonger as his favorite lobbyist slipped cash (or gold bars) into his campaign/back pocket.

Brad Nord's avatar

Right on about graham-deep State, along with the back sliding trump. Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Spend, Spend, Spend. Exactly as the Deep State AND the DEEP, DEEP STATE require.

Ian's avatar
Jul 15Edited

Speaking of other lobbying groups. In the UK there is a lobby group known as 55 Tufton Street- an address where a number of libertarian/alt-right think-tanks (who have never revealed their funders thought to be people like the Kochs) campaigned for the UK to be divided into a number of freeport/freetrade zones.

They were the ones behind the failed Liz 'Lettuce' Truss budget and under Rishi Sunak were proposing that large areas of the country including National Parks- were handed over to corporations to own and govern as they wished.

They are also heavily connected to climate change skepticism, euroscepticism, anti-immigration lobbying, and broader government deregulation that has filled the UK press for the last 10 years.

These groups alongside the Brexiteers advocated -using the Rees Mogg Sovereign Individual book as their intellectual blueprint- for a hard Brexit and were very happy to accept the resulting national chaos. Essentially, the book is a disaster capitalism manual for elites to bypass national regulations and thrive in a globalized economy, leaving the rest of society to suffer the consequences of societal and economic disorder.

Of course, Bill Bonner and Dan Denning have talked about their dealings with Rees-Mogg in this newsletter and talked about the ideology/dark fantasy of the Sovereign Individual.

Kevin Leader's avatar

The Fabians are in control

Ian's avatar
Jul 16Edited

This is whataboutism. If you think that they are an even worse lobbying group, could you provide some information. I would argue that the legacy of 15 years of Tufton influenced policies (Covid lockdown corruption, hard Brexit, selling off public services only to get a more expensive lower quality service) have been disastrous for the country and that the media narrative through the press and their promotion of parties such as Reform and Restore (which have terrible unfeasible economic policies) are still very active in fighting for this groups wishes.

Kevin Leader's avatar

I guess your a socialist? just look at history say no more

Ian's avatar
Jul 17Edited

lol you have 15 years of history here. Nothing to do with socialism more to do with Tufton thuggery and thievery.

Kevin Leader's avatar

They are not in government so it surly doesnt mean much

Ian's avatar
Jul 16Edited

I wish it were so! It would mean that historical policies and what has gone before have no bearing on today and that a lobby group cannot be effective through other means such as the press, opposition parties and putting the interests of stakeholders such as businesses forward. The Labour government has continued many of the Tufton policies and been moved to the right on many others such as immigration by Reform.

It's a shame that politics has become less about discussing points and getting to a reasonable consensus and finding the most pragmatic way forward.

'Footballification' has become the order of the day, where people pick sides and hold entrenched but unreasonable views and then seek to shout down their opposition. This is another legacy of the alt-right/Tufton style lobbying.

Kevin Leader's avatar

No its the Labour party two tier Keir.

Ian's avatar

Proves the point about footballification. Entrenched position, not willing to think about what’s happening and sees a slogan as an argument.

FlyingDad's avatar

Bill is correct that Israel owns about 95% of the U.S. government, and no, that’s not antisemitism.