Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Monty Carlo's avatar

However, against the Apple theory I would argue:

sitting on their mountain of cash does not make them one iota more "innovative" per Steve Job's disruptor credo. Oppositely, while sitting on that unproductive cash mountain, and seeming smart (and very smug), *sitting out the AI investment* so they can (supposedly) witness the glut as it might turn out to be a carbon copy of the same "overspend" that happened in fiber hardware during dot-com.

At the same time they might think they can then just take that cash mountain once the overspend (mania) has subsided and "just buy whoever is the best/most profitable/smartest in AI" and add it to their ecosystem.

I'd not bet on that particular outcome neither for them this time. They might have sat that one out one too many and either one, OpenAI or Anthropic might get a device out there first, very similar to what the original iPhone was to the Blackberry and poof, gone is the leadership.

No posts

Ready for more?