Discussion about this post

User's avatar
StarboardEdge's avatar

"𝘕𝘰 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘢 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘺 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘳 𝘭𝘢𝘸 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘜𝘚… 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘱𝘰𝘰𝘳 𝘙𝘪𝘤𝘬 𝘚𝘤𝘰𝘵𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘦 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘜𝘚 𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘳 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘴, 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘚𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘩𝘢𝘪."

This is extraordinarily disingenuous, Bill. The heart of the delisting issue (as you well know) is the fact that the Law and the SEC require 𝘼𝙪𝙙𝙞𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙨 of listed companies to open their books to the Regulators. Ignoring this requirement 3 years in a row 𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨, yet somehow many of the Chinese companies on US markets have ignored the requirement for nigh on 7 years with ZERO consequence. Seven years - odd that. Hmmm, let's see: ignore the law for the last 3 years of Trump's first term, then skate for the next 4 because you purchased the new "president" long ago and there is no way his SEC will enforce 𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 against you. Sounds like a plan if books are getting barbequed - which they likely have been and are still. Criminality like this is Gospel for communists and we are rapidly discovering that it is also the standard playbook of the dimocrat party in this Country (recent examples with more on the way include USAID Theft, NGOs skirting Laws without prosecution, Tishy James' magnificent mortgage fandango, and on and on and on.)

This law is in place for a reason - 𝗶𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗽𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗨𝗦 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁𝘀. This is just one of the many regulations that make our markets the safest, most genuine and most transparent in the world - a large driver of our Success as a Nation. How very devious and dishonest of you to not mention any of this in your crocodile-tear, deflective diatribe while you try to pawn everything off on the 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗱 Labor concerns outlined by Rick Scott. The lack of Inspection Access issues are what is driving the threat of delisting and you damn-well know it, yet you ignore that fact and prattle off a distraction that you think will make the Repugnicant's and Trump look ridiculous and out-of-touch.

Shame on you, Bill...

PS - The volume of the Chinese company stocks traded on US markets is minuscule in the big picture and if investors have such a hard on to put their money behind communists, they can always fund these same companies through the Hong Kong markets...

Expand full comment
Invector's avatar

Something I find almost comical is Bill's (and many other reader's) warnings about how Trump and his tariffs are going to crash the US and (possibly) the world economy.

For years now Bill has been warning, (and most of us agree), that because of stupid and short-sighted political decisions, there is an economic crash in our future that's just waiting for a trigger. And worse, there is no viable way to avoid it. When something can't continue on--it won't.

We here at Bonner Private Research are in maximum safety mode because bad times are coming--a debt crisis, a stock market crash of epic proportions, hyperinflation, deflation, depression--one or the other, or a combination of several, but it's going to happen and all we can do is prepare for it.

So my question for Bill and others is this--if it was drop dead certain anyway, why is NOW so terrible? If the system was so completely screwed up and unredeemable as we all claimed, then why the long faces? Let's just pass out the "I-Told-You-Sos" congratulate ourselves for being in maximum safety mode, and get ready for whatever emerges from the ashes.

I have no idea how all this tariff stuff will play out, and neither does anyone else here. But it just seems silly to me to bitch about an impending economic crisis that we all agreed was inevitable anyway.

Expand full comment
116 more comments...

No posts