Last Bear Standing
In a normal stock market, some companies do well; their stocks go up. Some don’t do so well; their stocks go down. Researchers try to figure out — in advance — which are which. Good research pays off.
Friday, January 17th, 2025
Bill Bonner, writing from Baltimore, Maryland
‘Behind every great fortune is a crime,’ wrote Balzac. On January 29, 2018, YouTube watchers were seeing one.
Down the highway rolled a sleek 18-wheeler,a heavy truck that promised not to destroy the planet. It was the creation of Trevor Milton and his hot-shot company, Nikola.
Trouble was, the video was a fake. The motive force was gravity, not Nikola’s advanced technology. The truck wasn’t running on its own power; it had none. It was just coasting down the hill.
For a while, the stock boomed. It rose to over $2,000 a share in June, 2020. Milton was a billionaire. But it now trades around $1.
A lot happened between $2,000 and $1. Among them, Trevor Milton got a four-year prison sentence.
MarketRealist.com:
A video purportedly showing a zero-emission truck in motion turned out to be fake and a court later found the ex-founder and chairman of Nikola Corporation guilty of defrauding investors by misleading them about the company's technological capabilities to artificially inflate its stock price. Milton was convicted of one count of securities fraud and two counts of wire fraud. The judge sentenced him to four years in prison along with a fine of $1 million.
According to Wall Street lore, a bull market will continue “until the last bear gives up.”
In 2023, famous bear short-seller Jim Chanos gave up. The Financial Times reported:
One of Wall Street’s best-known bears, Jim Chanos, has told his backers he is closing his main short-focused hedge funds after more than three decades. Chanos is best-known for his bet against Enron, the energy trader that collapsed in 2001... In a letter to investors seen by the Financial Times, Chanos wrote: “It is no secret that the long/short equity business model has come under pressure and interest in fundamental stock pickers has waned.”
Waned?!
Investors not interested in fundamental research?
Why bother with real research when you can get 25% (the S&P gain, 2024) for not doing it? Nvidia rose 171% last year, while the S&P 500 itself was up 25%. Fundamental research would have steered you away from both. In terms of value, neither looked like a good deal.
And this week, Hindenburg Research — which had revealed the fraud at Nikola — has thrown in the towel too. Reuters:
Hindenburg Research's founder said he would disband the firm whose reports sparked heavy selling by investors and investigations by authorities, wiping billions from the market values of companies including India's Adani Group and U.S.-based Nikola.
In a normal stock market, some companies do well; their stocks go up. Some don’t do so well; their stocks go down. Researchers try to figure out — in advance — which are which. Good research pays off.
But a normal stock market is fairly stable. As one company earns more, it takes sales from another company, which earns less. As one company cuts costs, it cuts income to other companies. Overall, the stock market doesn’t rise, or fall, very much. Because total purchasing power rises slowly, with GDP... at only around 3% per year. A stock market surge of 25% is unnatural, implausible... and suspect.
But a stock market juiced by the Fed... by hype... by hope... and tech ‘aspirations’... is a whole different thing. Real investors disappear; in come the clowns and gamblers.
How else to explain Fartcoin? The cryptocurrency made its debut in October. By December it had a value of $1.2 billion,which is a lot of pay for something of no known utility. But it was a perfect meme investment,created anonymously and said to have something to do with Elon Musk’s interest in the sounds of flatulence.
No use trying to do research on that one. There is nothing to research — no earnings, no profits, no business, no assets, no balance sheet, no audited financial reports, no CEO or parking lot attendant... no hush money... no lobbying expenses... no hanky panky in the office, no executive travel... no company logo. No nothing. Even gravity seems to be missing.
Maybe Hindenburg was the ‘last bear.’ Maybe not. But when Ursa Ultima finally gives up, we predict, the need for sharp pencils, green eye-shades, sober judgement and a gimlet glance will soon come back into fashion.
More to come...
Regards,
Bill Bonner
Research Note, by Dan Denning
A little air has come out of the Fartcoin bubble to start 2025 (see chart below). But earlier in the week, Polymarket (a predictions market that allows you to make bets on specific political and financial events), had the odds of Donald Trump creating a strategic Bitcoin reserve at 44%. The odds for the reserve, something Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis has repeatedly called for, are now down to 38%.
Yesterday, Scott Bessent, Trump’s nominee to be Treasury Secretary, told the Senate Finance Committee, ‘I see no reason for the US to have a central bank digital currency…If you hold US dollars, you can hold a variety of very secure US assets.’
Later today in my note to paying subscribers, we’ll look at the Dollar Index, 10-year US bond yields, and what may be Bessent’s first real financial crisis if confirmed by the Senate. Good luck Scott! You’re going to need it.
I wish we could get a "clean" column from Bonner more often instead of today's mixed bag. While I don't disagree with his conclusions and some of his points, he starts off on the wrong foot by quoting the following: ‘Behind every great fortune is a crime,’ wrote Balzac. This is a quote any looney-tune leftist would embrace. There are frauds in this world that make fortunes for a least a while until they get exposed, but there are thousands upon thousands that make their fortunes legitimately. Bonner then goes on to cite a fraud as if to verify the quote - it doesn't. If you think I'm nitpicking, I would counter that how you present your case is important. Bonner supposedly represents a free market perspective, but this is how he starts his column?
In addition, while Bonner's supposition that the stock market may be juiced by the Fed, by hype, etc. is certainly true, his statement that one company's sales takes away from another company sales and therefore the stock market should only rise by 3% annually is only partially true. As anyone knows, innovation and completely new technology and products can build new markets. And while these new markets may impact the current market, it is not out of the question that it grows the economy in a new direction. So, yes, today's stock market gains are suspect re Bonner's point, but that is not always the case.
Hi Dan I just wanted to try to clarify one of your points on Bessett today. The crypto community for the most part is not interested in supporting a central cryptocurrency which would be run by the government. Thus, Bessett remark was in line the crypto community. However, having a bitcoin reserve is considered desirable since it would validate and increase demand and is different than a central bank cryptocurrency. It would just be like holding a gold reserve or oil reserve.