42 Comments
User's avatar
An Ol' LSO's avatar

The real question is how do we reduce the number of humans in government - especially replace those in Congress with consensual vote of each representatives' voters. The robotics gathers what the voters want on each bill (with AI and internet - the People don't need humans in Congress at all) and make it a true Republic. The real problem in America is the Government and anything that can reduce and eliminate government employees is a blessing.

Expand full comment
Abe Porter's avatar

WOW. I agree with you.

Expand full comment
An Ol' LSO's avatar

Seriously.......we actually agree on something. LOL! As Roseanna Roseannadanna was known to say - "Just goes to show you, Abe, you never know!" Have a Great Day!

Expand full comment
StarboardEdge's avatar

Blink three times if you need us to rescue you, Ol' LSO.....

Expand full comment
Anne Keller's avatar

The "AI" we're investing in is mostly to replace white collar workers and sell more ads, not build real things. Big difference.

Expand full comment
John P Gallien's avatar

In the 70s, I was an engineer in a factory that was highly automated in some areas but still had quite a few human workers that worked on the production lines. They were unionized. It was always the union that stifled productivity. I moved on to another position in the company. Ten years after the factory, which was a staple in the community for decades, closed and the production was moved down south where unions were not an issue.

With that in mind, more recently I have always wondered why we couldn't bring production back to the US using automation in order to compete against low wage rates in other countries. It wouldn't add a lot of jobs but would certainly add some, and it would bring manufacturing back. Turns out the Chinese have beat us to it by incorporating automation even with their low wage rates. We need to do the same. It's a matter of survival.

Expand full comment
StarboardEdge's avatar

"𝘈 𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘬 "𝘰𝘧 𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘴? 𝘙𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥 𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘳? 𝘞𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸."

Well, I can point to a few BIG reasons "Why." It ALL comes back to Dumbing Down the populace, putting Man at the top of the heap and making EVERYTHING about Race or Sexual Orientation. News Flash (not) - these destructive EVILS from the last 50 years are laid squarely at the doorstep of the leftist dimocrats - 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣 𝙨𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙡𝙮 𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙪𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚.

Mission Accomplished! Now today's leftarde supporters are too stupid, indoctrinated and/or hateful to acknowledge where we are and what ignorant ideas/policies put us here - thus they have zero interest in actually fixing anything because they can't even see that their religion (leftist politics) is the root cause of our decline.

Then this:

"𝘖𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘧𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘳 𝘯𝘰𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘯-𝘵𝘩𝘦-𝘫𝘰𝘣 𝘪𝘯𝘫𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘬 𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘣𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘱𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯."

Well, yet at least.....

Expand full comment
Don Hrehirchek's avatar

Yes , but they do break down, that is robots. So some one has to know how to "repair" said bots. That leaves Me out for sure as I do not want to be an engineer.

Expand full comment
Ken's avatar

Not only is China graduating more engineers they are also sending them to the US to be educated and returned to China. Still China has the problem if everything is done by robots how will the 1.2 billion Chinese earn money.

Expand full comment
Patrick H Neff's avatar

Good question Ken , and if the US of A goes full robot how do our peons make a living ?

We can't all be robot engineers .

Expand full comment
Mike Ware's avatar

Robot Polishers

Expand full comment
Lucas Kandia's avatar

Bill’s reflection on the march of the machines is more than an economic forecast. It’s a moral one. AI can’t “take over” the world by itself. It has no hands, no feet, no way to twist a wrench or open a door. It can’t light a furnace or pull a trigger. Not yet.

But give it a body, give it arms that lift and legs that move, and suddenly it can act. And when those bodies are mass-produced, networked, and sitting quietly in the living rooms of a billion people, the difference between a harmless update, a catastrophic one or an intentional "kill" instruction, might just be, a single line of code.

It’s not artificial intelligence we should fear most. It’s the moment we hand it the keys to our homes. When the mind of the machine finally gets its hands? That’s when the future stops being theoretical.

Expand full comment
StarboardEdge's avatar

Sitting in my living room:

"Alexa/Siri - what do you think about Lucas' comment?"

Just kidding. I wouldn't let ANY of those spy devices or "smart" appliances into my home - even if they were paying me rent. My PHONE lives in a Faraday Bag fer cryin' out loud....

Expand full comment
Lucas Kandia's avatar

That’s the problem, isn’t it? Finding balance in a world where every tool is also a window. We want convenience — but not a live feed of our lives being mined for data.

At some point, I just decided to live my life. If they ever do send a killer drone my way, the odds of spotting it in time are about zero anyway. So I’ll keep smiling all the way to the morgue.

And for the record, I start and end each day with: “Copyright 2025, Lucas Kandia.” Just in case they ever try to use my own words against me — I’ll have Morgan & Morgan on retainer for the libel/privacy suit. I'm sure they're likely to branch out into that sector of law soon.

Expand full comment
Angry Icebergs's avatar

...BPR is now acknowledging robots as an inevitable workforce.

Mr. Bonner acknowledges a lot of Ai is required, i.e. investment into Ai...

So does BPR condone the massive Ai investments, or not?

Previous missives suggest not.

-

With the advent of robots, the low birth rate and need for immigration are non-issues.

The disadvantageous disparity in labor rates will slowly become inconsequential.

Lower populations in the future will likely be desirable and society's goal.

Robots will become less expensive as they become more prevalent and essential to our daily tasks.

Let's hope the progressive folks think like learned humans instead of robots and avoid taxing the industry to a standstill...

Expand full comment
Tim Pallies's avatar

Just curious. Who exactly is the "society" you refer to? "Lower populations in the future will likely be desirable and society's goal."

Expand full comment
Will Foster's avatar

Sounds like humanity as a whole. Yes, one way or another, there will be drastically fewer humans on this rock. Fermi paradox- L variable of the Drake equation.

Expand full comment
Angry Icebergs's avatar

... does the Drake equation account for cyborgs?

The "L" variable will still be sent... but likely not by 100% humanoid.

Expand full comment
Angry Icebergs's avatar

The society I refer to is a totality of people regarded as forming a community of interdependent individuals.

Expand full comment
Bob O'Brien's avatar

The reason we arn’t leading in assembly robotics is because back in the 1970’s moronic and greedy people sent all our factories to China and s.e Asian countries. Now we are seeing the tragedy this created. Thank God for Trump who is trying to re-establish manufacturing in the U.S. It will take years but its started.

Expand full comment
Egypt Solomon's avatar

You wanna know why the robots are better? They don’t whine! They don’t complain about health insurance! They don’t say, “Oh, I’m triggered by hot molten steel!” They just shut up and WORK! Meanwhile, Americans are filling out FAFSA forms to learn how to make TikToks.

Robots don’t take breaks, they don’t get drunk, they don’t complain. You know who else doesn’t do any of that? Dead people. Yeah. Real efficient. I guess the factory of the future is just full of corpses standing around. Real cost-effective. Mr. Bonner points out that in America 1 in 20 kids studies engineering, and in China it’s 1 in 3. I don’t know the math, but it seems like… uh… one of those groups is gonna build robots. The other’s gonna write a really long blog post about how they feel about robots. And then… you know… starve to death.

America went from the assembly line to the unemployment line in sixty years? WOW! We INVENTED the car factory! We INVENTED the robot! And now? We’re getting our asses handed to us by China because they’re actually training engineers while we’re drowning in student loans for Communications degrees. America’s like that guy who invents basketball, then loses every game 200 to nothing because he’s too busy arguing with the ref. The executives come back from China all “humble”? Haha, Wall Street Gobbers too busy cashing stock options to notice the factories going dark! At least the robots aren’t blowing the profits on call girls and private jets, well, not yet.

Expand full comment
Anne Keller's avatar

People will go to such lengths to identify "enemies" to blame - anything to avoid self reliance and responsibility. The spending done for military reasons would most likely cure cancer and wipe out hunger. But heaven forbid we could actually stop fighting long enough to focus on that.

Expand full comment
rKf's avatar

One of Taylor’s findings, at a GE plant as I recall, was that any positive change increased productivity. (I think it was better lighting). Unfortunately, it was temporary; (reverting to the mean?). Anyway, unions do have something to do with the problem. They will jump on the robot bandwagon as soon as a guaranteed national income is ratified. There are no simple fixes. “Ignorance changes over time. But it is always there, and it remains just as lethal,” p. 88 How To Stop Time by Matt Haig.

Expand full comment
Paul Murray's avatar

When guaranteed national income is ratified, capitalism will cease to exist. It will be swift regression to the stone age. The average man, the so-called worker, will have nothing to do. Not only will he be captive to the state, he will go insane with nothing to do. The human being is a goal-oriented individual. It's in his/her DNA. He/she must be striving to thrive. Then the government brings out the soma and tells everyone and everybody he/she is happy. Just take this pill... Best always. PM

Expand full comment
StarboardEdge's avatar

Nah. We'll just start killing each other out of boredom and over petty differences in things that don't matter.

Oh, wait...

Expand full comment
rKf's avatar

I know. Won’t it be marvelous? You know I’m kidding - don’t you?

Expand full comment
Paul Murray's avatar

Yes, but what'll be marvelous is that I'll be gone. We're living a Kafka novel. Best always. PM

Expand full comment
John P Gallien's avatar

True. Until it all implodes. Productivity always comes before consumption and if we are not producing....

Expand full comment
rKf's avatar

I’m obviously no Jonathan Swift, but really…

Expand full comment
Patrick H Neff's avatar

Another Great one, Bill , Thanks .

Expand full comment
William Diggins's avatar

Frederick Taylor was certainly the first to popularized time and motion studies, but it was W. Edwards Demming that took statistical process control to Japan. He couldn't get American manufacturers to pay attention.

Expand full comment
Brien's avatar

“ROBO”, the Global Automation and Robotics ETF, has 88 companies in its portfolio. The nation with the most companies, by far, is the US, with 33 of the 88. Japan is in 2nd place with 14. China and Taiwan are tied at 6 each.

Expand full comment
Paul Murray's avatar

Question: do you trust "us" to navigate/manage this transition to careless nothingness well and successfully? Best always. PM

Expand full comment
STEVE CAMPINI's avatar

You reap what you sow. It's as simple as that. A culture that rewards sloth, crime, corruption, perversion, dependence, injustice and falsity gets what it deserves.

Expand full comment