Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jimm Roberts's avatar

Bill's intriguing remarks make me wonder about wealth.

I've always contended wealth is something that must be made by man using scarce resources; capitalism is the name for the process, and money conveys the value for whatever was produced and sold.

Wither crypto? No scarce resources are required to make a crypto; just some key strokes and a cute name. Its initial value is declared by its creator and it on-going value determined by demand. There's no there there, but it's all the rage.

The only way I can rationalize crypto is treating it as a form of volatile currency storage: with money, you buy crypto whose value fluctuates sometimes wildly and, at some point in the future, you use it to acquire wealth

Given a choice, I'll take gold over crypto

Expand full comment
Mackinac's avatar

Coming from a mathematician's perspective I agree 100% with Bill's team's analysis but I've been thinking and acting along this line of reasoning for 30 years and I feel almost completely alone. Now I'm not complaining about my performance financially: I have 3 homes plenty of spending money while retired. I suppose that's why I like the reasoning behind valuations based upon gold i.e. it makes mathematical sense to me. BUT I've been waiting for 25 years for all this credit to collapse, for reality in money. That's a damn long time to wait for everyone else to come around to my thinking. That's a damn long time for all these economic geniuses to arrive at my and Bill's logic. Kinda makes me wonder if I'm correct.

Expand full comment
31 more comments...

No posts