30 Comments
User's avatar
Bill in Tokyo's avatar

Joel. I’m in awe—articulate, insightful, intriguing. Your “essay” is everything Twitter is not and can never be. Postman was right. And we have sunk even lower. What shall we do? What shall we ever do?

Expand full comment
Christopher's avatar

Once again, a wittily-drawn, historically and contemporaneously-endowed, thoughtful, provocative and engaging piece. Thank you.

(I am going to have to stop writing these comments; even to my own ears, my comments, though genuinely meant, are running the risk of sycophancy.)

Do keep up the great work though.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 2, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Christopher's avatar

Quite so...

Expand full comment
Susan's avatar

Thank you for taking the time to think, to write and gift us the opportunity to reflect….well done

Expand full comment
Elizabeth's avatar

One of the best essays I’ve read in a long time. The nail’s head has been hammered.

Expand full comment
Bob Noble's avatar

Brilliant Joel Bowman ..!! you are a perfect addition to the Bonner group. Many thanks.. Bob Noble.

Expand full comment
Graham Jones's avatar

Blimey - another brilliant essay but alas I think I may not have done it justice from having too much Cabernet Sauvignon so I will re-read tomorrow after a flat white!

Expand full comment
Andrew TORRANCE's avatar

There is probably a mathematical fallacy which underlies the way we think nowadays. Our reasoning can effectively be reduced to algorithms, which are arithmetical systems and which find their points of reference internally: they`re self-referential.

About 100 years ago Gödel proved his incompleteness theorems which demonstrated that any self-referential arithmetic system will give incoherent results. For instance, in these systems you can prove that the same thing is both right and wrong. My take on this:

With computers we place our idea

In the pure arithmetical sphere.

With assumptions inherent

The result’s incoherent

As Gödel made perfectly clear.

I see incoherence everywhere, even at the highest levels of the state. Only God can solve our big problems.

Expand full comment
Wendell Perry's avatar

A tiny bit too highbrow for me. Stop showing off and speak plainly.

Expand full comment
Ben Fellow's avatar

Great post. Well written. Entertaining and thoughtful.

Expand full comment
Mike Benson's avatar

Like your style, Joel!

Expand full comment
Mark Smith's avatar

Stellar

Expand full comment
Leonard Hartman's avatar

After trying to follow the thoughts in the leading portion of this article, I must confess I turned away lost.

Was Musk buying Twitter desirable?

Expand full comment
Todd Christensen's avatar

[Ecc 1:9-11 NKJV]

That which has been is what will be, that which is done is what will be done, and there is nothing new under the sun. Is there anything of which it may be said, "See, this is new"? It has already been in ancient times before us. There is no remembrance of former things, nor will there be any remembrance of things that are to come by those who will come after.

[Ecc 12:13-14 NKJV]

Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God and keep His commandments, for this is man's all. For God will bring every work into judgment, including every secret thing, whether good or evil.

Expand full comment
William Wydner's avatar

I don't understand a word of it.

Expand full comment
Kevin Leader's avatar

why

Expand full comment
Mamoru Nakatsui's avatar

Joel, it was probably an oversight on your part, but you implied that Antony J Blinken is the US Secretary of Defense, but he is the US Secretary of State.

Expand full comment
John Charles Scaling's avatar

What a lot of words and like "Seinfeld " mostly about nothing!

Expand full comment