Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ray Stedronsky's avatar

Battles eat resources. Javelins are what you use when you have them. They are expensive and not particularly plentiful. Tanks are what you use when all the Javelins are used up. Infantry is what you use when the tanks run out of fuel and ammo. Bayonets are what you use when the infantry runs out of ammo.

War is brutal, you never engage in a fair fight if you can avoid it. War is killing baby seals. Our politicians and the American public of the last 70 years does not understand this.

Expand full comment
John S's avatar

Oooops, looks like someone poked the wasps nest - again!! Some people do get a bit prickly when some of their narrative gets threatened, it would appear.

Tend to side with Bill on this one though as it does look as though the effectiveness of tank warfare might have had its day, based on what we are seeing, rather than the Russian version being crappy and obsolete - although I guess that's also possible.

But a military that has been showered with (flooded, more likely) obscene amounts of money and resources for forty years is also highly unlikely to be in a fighting fit state, imo, and from an outsiders perspective the US military looks extremely bloated and indulged.

Lets hope none of us actually have to find out though - going head to head with nuclear armed Russia ain't exactly the same thing as invading Vietnam, Honduras, Iraq, or Afghanistan, none of which were brilliant military successes either btw. Assuming that was the plan!!

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts