Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Heinrich Dahmen's avatar

Wonderful historical input ! Thanks

Expand full comment
FMMCCAP's avatar

1. For what it's worth, I reject the 2% Fed inflation target. Who gave them that leeway to define "stable monetary" policy. I would think 0% would qualify as stable.

2. The "hedonic adjustments" the BLS (or whoever) uses to determine the value of a basket of goods is outrageous. Who sez tech improvements "belong to the Fed?" I remember about 15 years ago when gasoline prices were skyrocketing at the pump, the smart BLS people determined that more people were swiping credit cards at the pump and saving 10 minutes by avoiding paying inside, and, at a standard average manufacturing wage of $44 per hour, were saving $7.50 in imputed labor per average fill-up, so instead of gasoline prices going up 40 or 50% on a per gallon price basis, the price to the consumer was actually going down because of the total cost of a fillup, taking convenience into account. Multiply these hedonic adjustments across everything, plus the fact that rising Asset Prices are not taken into account (real estate, automobiles, etc.), while falling prices are a disaster to be avoided at all costs, and you have an asymmetric disaster.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts