Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Egypt Solomon's avatar

Well then, if the country’s been growing at 2% instead of 4% and everyone’s real upset about it. I don’t know, two percent sounds pretty good to me. You know, if a doctor says, “your cancer is only growing at two percent” I’d probably say, “Well, that’s a relief.” And they say it’s all because of low interest rates. Yeah, yeah, they borrowed too much from the future. Which is funny because the future never asked for it. The future’s just sitting there like, “Hey, I didn’t order 30 trillion dollars of crap. I just wanted a hoverboard.”

The system is BUILT to slow down! You think the elites want you growing at 4%? Forget it! They want you fat, dumb, and filling out Federal Register Form #32-A about the “proper stacking height of cow shit.” So if you’ve got 107,000 pages of federal rules, that’s not governance, that’s a bad marriage, you know you’re screwed, you just don’t know what it’ll cost yet!

And let’s not talk about innovation.

We have the internet! We have AI! We had free trade! And what’d we do? We made Facebook so you can argue with your aunt about vaccines, (X) so the president can scream at 3 a.m., and Wall Street algorithms that can steal a trillion dollars while you’re still tryin’ to reset your Wi-Fi! So they’re not slowing GDP folks, they’re slowing us. We’re the product. We’re the cattle. And the elites? They own the slaughterhouse!

The whole economy’s just a Ponzi scheme run by old guys in suits who think lowering interest rates is an innovation. Like, “Hey, let’s borrow from the future so our grandkids can have the privilege of eating cat food in space!” And policies? Geez, we don’t need more policies, we need a policy torch. Every time a new one gets added, some poor bastard in Ohio has to hire a lawyer just to mow his lawn. And then we’re shocked! Shocked that GDP slowed down? It’s not a mystery, it’s math: debt plus bullshit equals America’s growth strategy. 🤩

Expand full comment
Tom Langdon's avatar

To be sure Trump did not set the stage for this economy, that was done by Nixon in August of 1971 at a time was scaping money together for my silver over black Datsun 240Z. The point here is that all of our illustrious presidents have used the slippery slope that Mr. Nixon provided to print our way out of trouble. To be sure they really had no viable options as the government had already printed more dollars than the gold it purportedly represented. So when the ship from France, sent by President de Gaulle, arrived in port carrying copious amounts of dollars, Nixon did not have the gold to make the trade, as promised, or he saw the gold reserves writing on the wall and percipitious closed the gold window. From there the printing began in earnest. The printing has been the way the government kept the lights on ever since. So the point here is why Trump the bad guy for continuing the printing lifestyle? Does Trump have any viable options? Yes he has two options: printing or default. This situation is not his doing. He has no alternative but to print with the consequence of the dollar losing more and more of its purchasing power, and then, behind the scenes, buy gold and get the country ready for the new financial system which shaping up very nicely.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts