Following the Leaders
For record gasoline prices, stimmie/gimmie checks and other bodacious proposals
(Source: Getty Images)
Bill Bonner, reckoning today from San Martin, Argentina...
What jolly insanity!
Came this report last week, from Yahoo Finance:
LA county, America's largest, sees gas prices hit record high
Los Angeles County saw a new record in average gas prices on Tuesday as the price of crude oil remains over $100 a barrel, signaling the cost to fill up at the pump won't be easing soon enough for drivers.
The average price for the largest U.S. county by population rose 2.3 cents to $6.011 — nearly 17 cents more expensive than it was a week ago, $1.224 higher than one month ago, and $2.085 greater than one year ago, according to figures from the American Automobile Association.
Highest Recorded Average Price
Regular Unleaded. $5.866. 3/22/22
Diesel $6.297. 3/11/22
California is a leader. Its governor, Gavin Newsom, who – along with Chelsea Clinton and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg – was formed by the World Economic Forum’s ‘School for Young Leaders’ (aka… the Davos Deciders) … has a plan to deal with inflation:
“We are working on a proposal that helps Californians with rising gas prices and provides funding to public transit so they can provide direct relief for riders,” Newsom spokesperson Erin Mellon told the Los Angeles Times.
Get it? Spend more money!
And Mr. Newsom is not alone in the dark night of economic ignorance. Along come three House Democrats with white canes. Yahoo Finance:
Three House Democrats introduced a bill last week to provide Americans with monthly direct payments through 2022 — or, at least, while prices remain exceptionally high.
Reps. Mike Thompson of California, Lauren Underwood of Illinois, and John Larson of Connecticut unveiled the plan. It would provide $100 monthly checks to individuals and $200 to couples while the national gas price average is $4 a gallon or above. Households would also be able to claim another extra $100 for each dependent they claimed on their tax returns.
Tax, Borrow or Print?
Let’s see. Where do they get the money? There are only three possible sources. Taxes. Borrowing. Or printing. By which of these are the people of the United States of America made better off? If the money is raised via taxation, it is simply taken from one citizen and given to another – both of whom suffer from rising prices. If it is borrowed, it must be paid back – with interest. By whom? How? When?
California cannot print money; but the USA can. And since fewer and fewer people want to lend at today’s ultra-low (but rising!) rates, most likely, all future spending programs will be funded by the Fed’s printing presses.
In other words, attempts to salve the hurt caused by rising prices will result in even higher prices.
We used to rely on Canadians to be a little more prudent and dignified than those of us south of the 49th parallel. No more. The province of Quebec is already ahead of Newsom and the three looney Democrats. The government in Quebec City announced a new spending program that is supposed to "help Quebecers cope with the sharp increase in the cost of living that we have seen in recent months,” according to Finance Minister Eric Girard.
As many as 6 million Quebecers are supposed to receive a $500 stimmie/gimmie check.
Mo’ Money
And here, back in the good ol’ USA, is CNN with an even more bodacious proposal:
The administration should ask Congress to authorize a payment of $1,100 per household to pay for four months of higher prices going forward, and provide an option for the president to provide a second or even third check to low-and-moderate income families for an additional four months in the event that prices remain high. We don’t know when this crisis is going to end or when prices for essential goods and services will return to more affordable levels.
Sure. Whatever. There must be at least 80 million ‘low and moderate’ income families in America. Giving them $1,100 every four months would cost, in round numbers, about $250 billion a year, with no plausible source of funds other than the printing press.
But wait. Why not tax oil company profits and distribute the money to consumers? Yes, that idea too – like a runaway trash barge – is floating around the media. It would ‘kill two birds with one stone,’ say proponents, who seem to have it in for our feathered friends. It would help reduce reliance on the devil’s pitch… while alleviating the pain of rising gasoline prices.
What is the matter with these geniuses? Prices rise (inflation) when the supply of money goes up faster than the goods and services that it buys. Of course, there’s always more to the story. But if you’ve understood that much, you’ve got the important part. Taxing oil company profits would only discourage production… while handing out money would encourage consumption. Gasoline prices would rise faster than ever.
Don’t they teach these ‘young leaders’ anything in their WEF school? Don’t they learn how to control inflation? Or do they just show them how to use inflation to get what they want?
But what do they want?
More to come…
Regards,
Bill Bonner
Joel’s Note: There are few things that enlightened elites and WEF graduates love to hate on more than the carbon-based energy industry. Oil and gas companies are right up there with red meat, good looks and funny jokes as progressive enemy #1.
And yet, since Bill and Dan issued their Trade of the Decade last year - essentially long “old school” energy - the world’s most hated on sector has climbed from one stubborn high to another.
But despite the finger-waver’s remonstrations, and as painful as high prices at the pump are today, there are plenty of catalysts that could put the squeeze on markets yet, sending prices even higher. Dan and Tom are tracking the Trade of the Decade in their weekly and monthly investment issues and updates.
If you’d like to follow their analysis and commentary, join our paid readers below. A subscription will run you less than $2/week which, for our money, is about the best investment you can make considering the work these guys are doing and the quality of the ideas they’re presenting. Check it out, here…
Enjoyed Joel and Bill's conversation video. However, it must have been early in the day as I only saw cups on the table. Where were the wine glasses? I have been fortunate to obtain Bill's Malbec wine from Argentina. It is very good and the only red wine my wife enjoys. Please continue to bring some sanity to the world.
I hesitate to write this comment, but what the heck; here goes.
I'm 83 and was born and raised in CALI. Spent the first half of my life there. I worked for Rothschild Refineries when gas was $0.30/gallon at the pump for Premium Ethal. Employees could buy gas at the Refinery, in Santa Fe Springs, CA for 9 cents/gallon. The reason gas is so high in CALI is Federal and State Taxes. The Taxes are supposed to pay for the highways and byways. In those days the Freeways were two lanes divided highways. Last time I was in LA the freeways were eight lanes on each side of the divider and three of those were fast lanes, pay, carpool, and busses: at peak travel times it was still stop and go for miles. California is a good place to be from: as far from as you can get. That's why I am now a Floridian and live in Paradise. Fresh air, green trees, and nice rain to keep the air clean. But I fear that it is going to disappear, not from rising waters due to 'Global Warming' or Sink Holes. It seems that they want to be like California. I may have to go to Argentina and become an 'ORIGINARIO'. Just Saying! Florida Jimmy.