Conspiracy to Print
Tuesday, February 10th, 2026
Bill Bonner, from Cork, Ireland
‘Conspiracy theorists’ have a lot to work with. Millions of pages of intel from Epstein have already been released. Millions more to go.
The press is still focused on ‘girls, girls, girls,’ which is always a page turner. Some of these ‘girls’ allege that they were raped. But when the FBI looked into it, the rape stories proved hard to corroborate. Or, so they said.
That left ‘statutory’ rape...which is what nailed Jeff Epstein, aka JE.
But most of the attention has gone to the long list of people with whom JE had connections. Some of these relationships might have been tawdry. Some criminal. Some treasonous. At this stage, it’s very hard to know.
And we don’t especially care...except...except...it may help us understand the likely trajectory of the US and its assets.
One of the ‘conspiracy theories’ that conspiracy theorists are likely to theorize about is the Zionist plot to take control of the US government.
Back in his first presidential campaign, it was alleged that the Kremlin had ‘dirt’ on Mr. Trump. He visited Moscow in 1987. The bait was offered, says a former KGB officer. He bit down hard.
Alternet:
Former KGB officer Alnur Mussayev, who once headed Kazakhstan’s security services, said both Kazakhstan and the Kremlin are in possession of an incriminating video of U.S. President Donald Trump, among other “compromising material,” Ukraine’s Kyiv Post reports.
Mussayev on Friday spoke with Ukraine’s Espreso TV program “Studia Zakhid,” where the Kyiv Post reports he “reiterated a claim he has expressed publicly for years – namely, that there is a Kremlin file with compromising video material from Trump’s stay at Moscow’s Ritz-Carlton hotel in 2013” for the Miss Universe pageant. According to Mussayev, Kazakhstan is also “in possession of that same kompromat.”
An updated version of this ‘conspiracy theory’ is that Russia was clandestinely backing JE...in order to get even more dirt on Trump and others.
True? We have no way of knowing.
But what is definitely true is that every special interest group wants to control US policy. The pro-Israeli lobby has been perhaps the most successful.
It is also true that the pro-Israel faction is not just in the US. Russia also has a sizable subculture of Israel-First billionaires who may influence its policies. Many of them are also Israeli citizens.
Conspiracy theorists will note that the Israel-firster Miriam Adelson gave Trump $100 million to clinch the 2024 election and promised another $250 million if he’d run for a third term. AIPAC, meanwhile, the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, is the single biggest contributor to Congressional candidates. Chicken feed, by comparison, (and it might be a coincidence, too!), but Adelson and other big Israel-First donors have ponied up more than $2 million to defeat Tom Massie, the member of Congress most responsible for getting the Epstein files released.
Kevin Warsh is the son-in-law of Ronald Lauder, president of the Mega Group, a pro-Israel non-profit founded by Les Wexner, Epstein’s mega patron. Now, with Warsh at the head of the Fed, the Israel firsters may arguably control the president, Congress, and the Fed too.
Does it matter? Maybe not for Warsh. Like Trump, he must play the cards History has given him. He aims to reduce the Fed’s balance sheet but retain or even raise interest rates. He hopes that AI will boost GDP enough to make it possible.
But the Fed will have to borrow/refinance $10 trillion in treasury debt over the next 12 months. That will be harder than ever. Because of other Biden and Trump policies — notably, using the dollar, tariffs and the US financial system as weapons — the foreigners no longer regard Treasury bonds as risk-free assets. Gold, now, is a more important reserve asset than US Treasuries.
So, with fewer foreign lenders, Warsh will depend more and more on US-based savers. These will demand more reward for the additional risk they take on. And this will mean higher real interest rates for everyone.
Warsh will have no choice. Conspiracy or no conspiracy, he will have to do what almost anyone in his place would do -- ‘print’ money to fund US debt.
Shalom.
Regards,
Bill Bonner

Research Note, by Dan Denning
The first, ‘laminar’ or smooth phase of the gold bull market is over. The next two phases are still to come, will be more ‘turbulent,’ and could see the gold price rise as high as $12,595/oz. Prepare for devaluation or default.
Those are some of the conclusions from a new research paper published yesterday by Daniel Oliver from Myrmikan Research. Oliver argues that the ‘external’ phase of the current gold bull market began in October 2022, in response to the US weaponization of the dollar. This caused central banks and other large investors to accumulate gold at record rates and reduce holdings or new purchases of US government bonds (driving up the gold price to over $5,000/ounce).
Phases two and three of the bull market—yet to come he argues—will be ‘internal.’ Interest expense and debt costs will rise inside the US as external capital flows dry up. The Fed will restart Quantitative Easing (QE) to make up for the foreign slack. But this time, QE will unleash massive inflation in the real economy.
Higher interest rates in response to higher inflation create a government bond ‘death spiral,’ according to Oliver. This will force the Fed to buy all government bonds to avoid a default, resulting in the destruction of the currency, which cannot be avoided. The gold price forecast is based on the Fed having to increase as a percentage of the Fed’s assets in order to ‘cover’ rising liabilities.





You’re a liar Bill. AIPAC has not contributed the most. Qatar and Elon control government agencies and our educational system. I quote perplexity.
What Qatar funds in the U.S.
• Qatar has spent nearly $250 million on firms registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) since Donald Trump was first elected, and its agents have logged more in‑person meetings with U.S. political contacts than any other foreign country.[quincyinst]
• OpenSecrets data show the “Government of Qatar” reporting about $180,000 in federal lobbying spending in 2024 under that specific client entry, but this does not include all Qatari‑linked entities and contracts.[opensecrets]
• Qatar is the largest foreign government donor to U.S. universities, with about $4.7 billion in disclosed gifts between 2001 and 2021.[wikipedia +2]
• It is described as the third‑largest foreign government donor to U.S. think tanks, with around $9.1 million over five years.[wrmea +2]
“Biggest contributor to officials” vs. other donors
• Federal campaign contributions to U.S. candidates and parties are dominated by U.S. individuals, corporations (via PACs), and domestic interest groups; the largest “big donors” tracked are wealthy Americans, not foreign governments like Qatar.[opensecrets +2]
• Foreign nationals and foreign governments are generally prohibited from directly contributing to U.S. federal campaigns, so Qatar’s influence operates mainly through lobbying contracts, investments, media, universities, and think tanks rather than straightforward campaign checks to officials.[opensecrets +2]
Bottom line
• Qatar is one of the most influential foreign players in Washington through lobbying and institutional funding and is unusually large among foreign government donors to U.S. universities and think tanks.[thehill +3]
• It is not, however, the single biggest overall financial contributor to U.S. government officials when compared to domestic megadonors and PAC networks that fund campaigns on a much larger scale.[usafacts +2]
And it is Elon Musk who contributes the most to U.S. politicians. Again I quote Perplexity.
For the 2024 election cycle, the single largest financial contributor to U.S. politicians was Elon Musk, who gave more than 290 million dollars to Republican candidates, PACs, and other outside political groups.[opensecrets +1]
Largest individual donors (recent cycle)
• Elon Musk: Over 291 million dollars to Republican candidates and conservative‑aligned committees in 2024.[golocalprov +1]
• Several other donors each exceeded 100 million dollars in the same cycle, but all gave significantly less than Musk.[opensecrets]
How this is measured
• These figures come from analyses of Federal Election Commission data that total contributions to candidates, parties, PACs, and super PACs, then rank donors by aggregate giving.[opensecrets +2]
• Rankings can vary slightly by whether you look only at super PACs, only direct candidate giving, or all federal political spending combined, but Musk remains the top overall donor for 2024 under these standard aggregations.[opensecrets +2]
Here are more of your bullshit anti-Semitic lies. According to Perplexity, here are the Super PACs that contributed the most to US politicians.
Largest PACs by money raised/spent (2024 cycle)
These figures are for federal activity in the 2023–2024 cycle.
• ActBlue – About 3.8 billion dollars raised and 3.79 billion spent, serving as the main small‑dollar online fundraising PAC for Democrats.[opensecrets +2]
• WinRed – About 1.69 billion dollars raised and 1.68 billion spent as the Republican counterpart to ActBlue.[usafacts +2]
• Senate Majority PAC – Roughly 703 million dollars raised and 704 million spent, the main Democratic Senate super PAC.[opensecrets +1]
• Future Forward USA Action – Around 559 million dollars raised and spent, a major pro‑Democratic super PAC heavily involved in presidential and congressional races.[opensecrets]
• Make America Great Again Inc – About 410 million dollars raised and 457 million spent supporting Donald Trump and allied Republicans.[opensecrets]
Biggest PACs by independent expenditures
Looking just at outside spending (ads and other independent expenditures):
• Future Forward USA – About 510 million dollars in independent expenditures.[opensecrets]
• Make America Great Again Inc – About 377 million dollars.[opensecrets]
• Senate Majority PAC – About 311 million dollars.[opensecrets]
• Congressional Leadership Fund – About 217 million dollars, the main House Republican super PAC.[opensecrets]
• Senate Leadership Fund – About 211 million dollars, the main Senate Republican super PAC.[opensecrets]
Top traditional PACs giving directly to candidates
For direct contributions to candidates (not independent ads), the largest givers in 2024 were much smaller in scale:
• Never Back Down Inc – About 5.25 million dollars to candidates, all to Republicans.[opensecrets]
• National Association of Realtors PAC – About 4.19 million dollars split roughly evenly between Democrats and Republicans.
And Massie is an anti-Semitic turd 💩 like you are Bill. Eat Shiite Bill .
Disheartening to learn how easy it is for foreign countries exploit the US, welfare fraud especially
More disheartening is no president and Congress in modern times has reduced the deficit